Opis forum
Gość
Sodomy is associated with profanation, humilitation of personal dignity and impure pleasure.
Two Biblical stories about sodomy in Sodom and Gibeah (in which sodomic intercourse did not take place) were associated with:
- intercourse against nature (very humilitating for personal dignity, repulsive and in fact non-procreative at all)
- non-marital intercourse
- same-sex intercourse (men with another man)
- involuntary intercourse (rape)
- "mass" intercourse (many men)
It looks that many men in Sodom and Gibeah tried to rape anally another men. Humilitation of another person might be main motivation of it, not (just) libidinal lust
Sodomites might want to profoundly, totally humilitate Lot and two angels by ejaculating own semen in another man's rectum
Gość
Anal "sex" - "physical image of sin", blasphemous parody of love, goodness, family and sexuality.
It is certainly not for procreation. It can be practiced mainly for impure bliss.
It looks as an act of ruthless domination, dehumanization of the passive partner. It may "reduce" passive partner to "an anus".
It looks as a "sounding picture of sin itself". It is NOT beautiful.
It looks that men in Sodom and Gibeah wanted to commit mass anal rape on a person who had the same sex as them. It is blatantly against Order and Dignity in creation. Why such a thing came to their minds? This behavior looks like "furious rage" against beauty, innocence, order, dignity of creation. It is "complete parody and profanation", desacration of personhood, procreation, family, sexuality and body.
Gość
I think that Incarnation is definitely NOT DEPENDENT of ANY sin, also of the sin of Adam. In the world without sin there would be no need of Redemption, of course. But all people would be immaculate and sinless and saved for eternity. No sin, no guilt, no lust, no ugliness, no pain, no punishment at all.
For me the theory that there would be NO Incarnation without the existence of sin looks... blatantly wrong, "in some way potentially very blasphemous"! It makes SIN a "PARENT" of The Most Beautiful of Human Natures in some sense! It makes the existence of Human Nature of Christ a consequence of sin!
Incarnation is the most beautiful "Part" of the Creation. Without Incarnation there would be also no great dignity of Christ's Mother. It would be very sad if existence of any human would be a result of sin. I do not believe in dependence of creating any person of sin.